Original text
子禽问于子贡曰:“夫子至于是邦也,必闻其政。求之与?抑与之与?”子贡曰:“夫子温、良、恭、俭、让以得之。夫子之求之也,其诸异乎人之求之与!”
Translation
Tzu-Ch'in asked Tzu Kung, "Always did our teacher know the politics of a country when he paid a visit to it. Did he seek it out by himself, or he was told without an exploration?" Tzu Kung replied, "Our teacher got such knowledge via his gentleness, savoir-vivre, submissiveness, abstention and humbleness. Isn't there great difference between our teacher's way to seek and others'?"
Annotation from research
This versus is quite interesting. It is a direct quotation from the conversation taken place between two students of Confucius to profile him. I don’t think there will be many employees to have such respectful appraises for their bosses.
But Confucius didn’t have much political achievement during his life. He was rather an educator than a politician. However, he was popular among the seigneurs and was often invited to share his ideas. From many other materials and in the Analects itself, we can find many such records. Here the question asked by Tzu-Ch'in is thought-provoking. Why it is important to know how Confucius got the knowledge about the politics that ruled in countries he visited? As it was said in the previous versus by Tseng Tzu, Confucians don’t deliver his knowledge and ideas before he is learned about it. How to get such the knowledge about the politics? It is no good inquiring from the governors directly, since no governors would be willing to share a stranger with real problems. And it is impossible to get any idea from the people other than the governors since the reality is always concealed from them. The answer conducted by Tzu Kung is not only smart but also revealing the truth. Confucius is a master of the etiquettes (actually one of the inventors). His behavior was reasonable enough for establishing a trustworthy impression among the governors, so they were willing to tell him the truth. That’s what Tzu Kung called “a seeking way different from others”. Actually he meant that a benevolent personal character helps in establishments of trustworthy relationship even for the politicians who are rarely honest, and that will lead to a better idea exchange and a smarter conduct of political practice.